Ditto AI vs n8n

n8n is a workflow automation platform for technical teams: you build on a canvas or in plain language, run it on n8n Cloud or your own servers, and add AI agents, MCP and human approval steps. Ditto AI skips the building: you record the task once on your Mac and it becomes an agent with a tool for each step. Pick n8n for server-side flows you own end to end; pick Ditto for a desktop task you'd rather demonstrate.

The short answer

n8n is for building workflows that run on a server. It calls itself an "AI Workflow Automation Platform" (n8n.io). You build on a canvas, or with the AI Workflow Builder, which lets you "create, refine, and debug workflows using natural language" (docs), and it runs on n8n Cloud or on your own infrastructure, "on-prem, air-gapped if you need it" (n8n.io).

Ditto AI is for a task you do on your Mac. You record it once; Ditto writes down the steps, finds and checks a tool for each, and hands you an agent that runs in Ditto or in Claude Code or Kiro.

Side by side

Ditto AIn8n
How you define itRecord the task onceBuild on the canvas or describe it to the AI Workflow Builder (source)
What you getAn agent: steps, inputs, a checked tool per step, a policyA workflow of nodes, or an n8n agent (source)
Where it runsOn your Mac: Ditto, Claude Code or Kiro CLIn8n Cloud or self-hosted (source)
ApprovalEvery step, tool and permission before the first run; writes can be draftsYou can "require human approval before an AI Agent executes a specific tool" (source)
MCPFinds MCP servers for your steps and checks eachBoth an MCP server and a client; clients can "Create and edit workflows" (source)
LicenceNot open sourceSustainable Use License, fair-code; n8n says it doesn't use "an open source license" (source)
PriceFree; no paid plan yet (pricing)Community edition free to self-host; Cloud Starter €24 a month (€20 yearly), Pro €60 (€50), Business €800 (€667), self-hosted only (source)

Where n8n is ahead

  • You can own all of it. The free Community edition has "almost the complete feature set" (docs).
  • It's always on: webhooks, schedules, retries and queue mode, on a server rather than your laptop (pricing).
  • More integrations, and MCP in both directions: "over 500 integrations" plus custom API calls (n8n.io).
  • Approval reaches reviewers where they are, through Slack, Teams, email and more (docs).

Where Ditto is different

  • No building. The steps come from what you did, each citing the frames and clicks it came from.
  • Desktop apps and signed-in sites on your Mac are in scope.
  • No server to run. The agent runs where you are.
  • It hands the agent to Claude Code or Kiro with its tool servers and allowlist.

Choose n8n if

  • You want workflows running on your own servers, on triggers and schedules, around the clock.
  • You're happy to build a workflow and want fixed steps with AI only where needed.
  • Data has to stay inside your own infrastructure.

Choose Ditto AI if

  • The task lives on your Mac, and you'd rather demonstrate it than model it.
  • You want an agent in Claude Code or Kiro rather than a workflow on a server.
  • You don't want to run or maintain a server.

See also Ditto AI vs Zapier and Mac automation tools compared.

Do it once. Then hand it off.

Record a task on your Mac and Ditto AI builds the agent. You read it before it runs.

macOS 15 or later · Apple silicon · Opening it the first time