Ditto AI vs Zapier

Zapier is a cloud automation platform: you describe or build a Zap, and it runs on triggers across more than 9,000 apps, with AI steps and an MCP server that AI clients such as Claude Code can call. Ditto AI starts from a recording of you doing the task once on your Mac and turns it into an agent that runs in Ditto, Claude Code or Kiro. Pick Zapier for always-on flows between web apps; pick Ditto for desktop work you'd rather show than specify.

The short answer

Zapier connects web apps in the cloud. You describe a workflow to Copilot, which "will create a basic outline of a trigger and one or more actions" (help), or build it in the editor, and the Zap runs on Zapier. Zapier MCP gives AI clients "9,000+ apps and 40,000+ actions" (help).

Ditto AI starts from what you did. Nothing is described or drawn: you record the task once on your Mac, and Ditto turns it into an agent with a checked tool for each step, which runs in Ditto or in Claude Code or Kiro.

Side by side

Ditto AIZapier
How you define itRecord the task onceDescribe it to Copilot or build it in the editor (source)
What you getAn agent: steps, inputs, a checked tool per step, a policyA Zap: a trigger and actions, optionally with an AI by Zapier step (source)
Where it runsOn your Mac: Ditto, Claude Code or Kiro CLIIn Zapier's cloud: "Zapier runs the action against the app and returns the result" (source)
Desktop appsYes: Mac apps as well as sitesWeb apps with a Zapier integration (source)
Review before it actsEvery step, tool and permission before the first run; writes can be draftsCopilot's "Ask as you build" mode; in AI steps "your tools run without pausing for confirmation" unless you require approval per tool (source, source)
In Claude Code, Kiro, CodexInstalls into Claude Code or Kiro CLI; not Codex yetZapier MCP connects to all three (Kiro setup)
PriceFree; no paid plan yet (pricing)Free (100 tasks a month); Professional from US$19.99 a month and Team from US$69, billed yearly; MCP uses two tasks per tool call (source)

Where Zapier is ahead

  • Reach: "9,000+ apps and 40,000+ actions", with Zapier handling "app connections, credentials, and rate limits" (help).
  • Always on. Zaps run on triggers whether your computer is on or not. A Ditto agent runs on your Mac.
  • Teams and governance: shared Zaps and connections, SAML SSO, SCIM and an audit log (pricing).
  • Its MCP server already works in Claude Code, Kiro and Codex on every plan, including Free (help).
  • A free plan, published prices and SOC 2 Type II (Zapier MCP).

Where Ditto is different

  • Desktop work. A task that touches a Mac app is in scope, not only web apps with an integration.
  • You show it once instead of describing every step or drawing every branch.
  • Permissions are fixed by a table before the first run, rather than switched on tool by tool.
  • Recordings and credentials stay on your Mac.

Choose Zapier if

  • The job starts from an event in a web app and has to run around the clock.
  • Every app in the flow has a Zapier integration and the rules don't change.
  • You want Claude Code, Kiro or Codex to reach thousands of SaaS actions with credentials Zapier manages.

Choose Ditto AI if

  • The task uses desktop apps or files on your Mac.
  • You'd rather do the task once than build it.
  • You want the permissions settled before the first run.

Can you use both?

Yes, and it often makes sense: Zapier for the always-on web plumbing, Ditto for the desktop task that starts when you sit down to do it. See the wider picture in Mac automation tools compared.

Do it once. Then hand it off.

Record a task on your Mac and Ditto AI builds the agent. You read it before it runs.

macOS 15 or later · Apple silicon · Opening it the first time